Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally
Sherwood Forest Eviction Risk: Moderate , Glen Raven
Tract 37001020501 · Alamance County, NC · pop 3,857 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
The Sherwood Forest area of Glen Raven is where census tract 37001020501 sits, home to 3,857 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is $1/10. On the national scale it ranks #51,993 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
28% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 10% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $784 monthly, set against $56,688 in average yearly household income, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 36% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 26%
Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units1,311
Renter share35.6%
SVI overall0.67
Poverty rate16.6%
Median income$56,688
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
72
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
66
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Glen Raven and the region
Centroid at 36.1221, -79.4795 · click any tract to drill in
Why Sherwood Forest scores 4.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Glen Raven
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
16.6% poverty · this tract
4.1
Supply constraint
$784 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Glen Raven
2.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Glen Raven
6.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Glen Raven
4.3
How Sherwood Forest compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 67
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 59%Socioeconomic
- 46%Household composition
- 46%Racial/ethnic minority
- 84%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 408Total filings over 17 yrs
- 4.87%Avg annual filing rate
- 8.7%Peak (2003)
- 20Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 17 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.7%Housing insecurity
- 9.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 18.3%Food insecurity
- 15.3%SNAP enrollment
- 10.3%Transit barriers
- 12.1%No health insurance
- 19.0%Frequent mental distress
- 35.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Sherwood Forest
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 6.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Glen Raven, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Alamance County average of 5.2 and in line with the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 67th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 408 eviction filings here over 17 tracked years, with about 4.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 8.7% of renter households in 2003.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 37001020501
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37001020501?
Census tract 37001020501 in the Sherwood Forest neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 37001020501?
Median gross rent is $784/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 37001020501?
16.6% of residents in tract 37001020501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,857.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 37001020501?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 67th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 46th, minority 46th, housing 84th.
Q5
Is tract 37001020501 considered part of Sherwood Forest?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37001020501 fall within Sherwood Forest (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37001020501?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 408 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 37001020501 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.87% of renter households, peaking at 8.7% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 37001020501 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 37001020501 compare to Glen Raven overall?
Tract 37001020501 scores 4.3/10, higher than the parent city of Glen Raven at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Glen Raven; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related