Neighborhood · Ranked #41,065 of 84,120 nationally
Laurelton Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Graham
Tract 37001021102 ·
Alamance County, NC · pop 3,314 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
With a score of 5.1/10, tract 37001021102 in the Laurelton Village area of Graham ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 3,314 residents. On the national scale it ranks #49,027 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 24% of renter households, a moderate level, and 2% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $902 monthly, set against $56,422 in average yearly household income, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 36% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%Stable renters 27%Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units1,357
Renter share35.8%
SVI overall0.55
Poverty rate11.5%
Median income$56,422
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Laurelton Village
Moderate
Within parent city
75th percentile
#2 of 5 tracts In Graham
High
Within county
61th percentile
#15 of 37 tracts In Alamance County
Elevated
Within state
58th percentile
#1,118 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Graham and the region
Centroid at 36.0377, -79.3747 · click any tract to drill in
Why Laurelton Village scores 4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Graham
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
11.5% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$902 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Graham
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Graham
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Graham
6.0
How Laurelton Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 55
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
53%Socioeconomic
42%Household composition
46%Racial/ethnic minority
63%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
1,551Total filings over 17 yrs
20.45%Avg annual filing rate
40.8%Peak (2018)
204Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year2002 to 2018
Filings climbed 200% over the past 17 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
12.3%Housing insecurity
8.0%Utility-shutoff threat
15.2%Food insecurity
12.2%SNAP enrollment
8.4%Transit barriers
10.9%No health insurance
16.9%Frequent mental distress
34.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Laurelton Village
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Graham eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Alamance County average of 5.2 and in line with the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 12.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 55th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 37001021102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37001021102?
Census tract 37001021102 in the Laurelton Village neighborhood scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 37001021102?
Median gross rent is $902/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 24% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 37001021102?
11.5% of residents in tract 37001021102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,314.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 37001021102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 55th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 53th, household 42th, minority 46th, housing 63th.
Q5
Is tract 37001021102 considered part of Laurelton Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37001021102 fall within Laurelton Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37001021102?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,551 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 37001021102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 20.45% of renter households, peaking at 40.8% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 37001021102 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 37001021102 compare to Graham overall?
Tract 37001021102 scores 4/10, higher than the parent city of Graham at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Graham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Graham
Top eight tracts in Graham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.