Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Whittenburg Springs Eviction Risk: Lower , Bethlehem

Tract 37003040700 · Alexander County, NC · pop 6,922 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

With a score of 3/10, tract 37003040700 in the Whittenburg Springs area of Bethlehem, NC reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 6,922. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1.4/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 10% Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units2,671
Renter share13.1%
SVI overall0.37
Poverty rate8.9%
Median income$72,266

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Whittenburg Springs
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Bethlehem
Moderate
Within county
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Alexander County
Very Low
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#1,927 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Bethlehem and the region

Centroid at 35.8303, -81.3009 · click any tract to drill in

Why Whittenburg Springs scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Bethlehem
2.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.1
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
8.9% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$742 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bethlehem
1.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bethlehem
3.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bethlehem
2.0

How Whittenburg Springs compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Whittenburg Springs risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0407003.1Bethlehemparent city3.7Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 37

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 380Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 6.52%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.0%Peak (2008)
  • 21Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 37003040700
Filings climbed 75% over the past 16 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Whittenburg Springs

Running cool, housing-court posture reads 2/10. Well under the midpoint, regional political climate reads 2.1/10. Severe burden reaches 11%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Court records carry 380 eviction filings across 16 observed years. 26% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Alexander County average of 30.7%. It sits 0.7 points below the Alexander County average of 3.7.

Filings peaked in 2008 at 12.0% of renter households. In a typical year about 6.5% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

At 13% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 12% of average household income of $72,266, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Statewide the NC average is 4.0, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 37003040700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37003040700?

Census tract 37003040700 in the Whittenburg Springs neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37003040700?

Median gross rent is $742/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37003040700?

8.9% of residents in tract 37003040700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,922.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37003040700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 37th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 51th, household 53th, minority 15th, housing 24th.
Q5

Is tract 37003040700 considered part of Whittenburg Springs?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37003040700 fall within Whittenburg Springs (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37003040700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 380 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 37003040700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.52% of renter households, peaking at 12.0% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 37003040700 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 37003040700 compare to Bethlehem overall?

Tract 37003040700 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Bethlehem at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bethlehem; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related