Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Biltmore Forest Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 37021002101 ·
Buncombe County, NC · pop 1,654 · 55% of tract blocks fall in Biltmore Forest
37021002101 is a census tract in Biltmore Forest, NC. It scores 3/10 for landlords. It is home to 1,654 residents. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%Stable renters 1%Owners 98%
Tract context
Occupied units544
Renter share2.8%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$166,563
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Biltmore Forest
Moderate
Within county
6th percentile
#61 of 65 tracts In Buncombe County
Very Low
Within state
28th percentile
#1,927 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Low
National
20th percentile
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Biltmore Forest and the region
Centroid at 35.5351, -82.5557 · click any tract to drill in
Why Biltmore Forest scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Biltmore Forest
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Biltmore Forest
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Biltmore Forest
1.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Biltmore Forest
4.7
How Biltmore Forest compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 1
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
4%Socioeconomic
26%Household composition
4%Racial/ethnic minority
2%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
14%Grade A
0%Grade B
1%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
3.9%Housing insecurity
2.5%Utility-shutoff threat
4.6%Food insecurity
3.0%SNAP enrollment
3.1%Transit barriers
4.7%No health insurance
10.2%Frequent mental distress
24.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Biltmore Forest
20% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, tenant-organizing strength reads 1.9/10. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2/10.
SNAP participation runs 3.0% against 15.2% nationally. It sits 1.1 points below the Buncombe County average of 4.1.
Court records carry 7 eviction filings across 3 observed years. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. The worst year on record was 2010, when 6.3% of renter households were served.
This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Asheville. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 4.0% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 3% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
Social vulnerability reads 1.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 37021002101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37021002101?
Census tract 37021002101 in Biltmore Forest scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 37021002101?
2.5% of residents in tract 37021002101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,654.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 37021002101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 26th, minority 4th, housing 2th.
Q4
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37021002101?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 7 eviction filings across 3 validated years in tract 37021002101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.04% of renter households, peaking at 6.3% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q5
What share of households in tract 37021002101 struggle to pay rent?
About 3.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 37021002101 compare to Biltmore Forest overall?
Tract 37021002101 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Biltmore Forest at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Biltmore Forest; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7
Was tract 37021002101 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.