Neighborhood · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally
Riverwalk Eviction Risk: Lower , Concord
Tract 37025042601 ·
Cabarrus County, NC · pop 6,480 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
The Riverwalk area of Concord anchors census tract 37025042601, which lands at $1/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #52,002 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 78% of renter households, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,943 monthly, set against $129,688 in average yearly household income, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 22% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17%Stable renters 5%Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units2,148
Renter share22.0%
SVI overall0.27
Poverty rate2.2%
Median income$129,688
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Riverwalk
Very Low
Within parent city
4th percentile
#23 of 24 tracts In Concord
Very Low
Within county
9th percentile
#43 of 47 tracts In Cabarrus County
Very Low
Within state
3th percentile
#2,593 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Concord and the region
Centroid at 35.3928, -80.6792 · click any tract to drill in
Why Riverwalk scores 1.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Concord
3.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
2.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,943 rent vs county FMR
5.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Concord
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Concord
2.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Concord
3.0
How Riverwalk compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 27
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
27%Socioeconomic
14%Household composition
44%Racial/ethnic minority
48%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
7.8%Housing insecurity
5.0%Utility-shutoff threat
8.8%Food insecurity
6.2%SNAP enrollment
5.4%Transit barriers
7.2%No health insurance
14.5%Frequent mental distress
27.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Riverwalk
What moves this score most is supply constraint at 5.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Concord eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Cabarrus County average of 5.0 and in line with the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 84 eviction filings here over 13 tracked years, with about 6.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.7% of renter households in 2016.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 27th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 37025042601
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37025042601?
Census tract 37025042601 in the Riverwalk neighborhood scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 37025042601?
Median gross rent is $1,943/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 78% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 37025042601?
2.2% of residents in tract 37025042601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,480.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 37025042601?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 27th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 27th, household 14th, minority 44th, housing 48th.
Q5
Is tract 37025042601 considered part of Riverwalk?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37025042601 fall within Riverwalk (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37025042601?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 84 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 37025042601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.12% of renter households, peaking at 3.7% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 37025042601 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 37025042601 compare to Concord overall?
Tract 37025042601 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Concord at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Concord eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Concord
Top eight tracts in Concord ranked by composite eviction-risk score.