Neighborhood · Ranked #77,226 of 84,120 nationally
Creekwood Eviction Risk: Lower , Trent Woods
Tract 37049960403 ·
Craven County, NC · pop 4,086 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Census tract 37049960403 runs through the Creekwood neighborhood of Trent Woods. With 4,086 residents, it scores 5.2/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 45% of US census tracts.
About 46% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 8% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,342 a month against an average household income of $109,097 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 7% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 4%Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units1,741
Renter share7.2%
SVI overall0.02
Poverty rate1.2%
Median income$109,097
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Creekwood
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Trent Woods
Moderate
Within county
0th percentile
#26 of 26 tracts In Craven County
Very Low
Within state
6th percentile
#2,501 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Trent Woods and the region
Centroid at 35.0820, -77.0920 · click any tract to drill in
Why Creekwood scores 1.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Trent Woods
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.1
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
1.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,342 rent vs county FMR
5.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Trent Woods
6.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Trent Woods
2.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Trent Woods
4.2
How Creekwood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 2
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
2%Socioeconomic
44%Household composition
3%Racial/ethnic minority
4%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
5Total filings over 2 yrs
1.59%Avg annual filing rate
1.9%Peak (2016)
2Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
4.3%Housing insecurity
2.9%Utility-shutoff threat
4.7%Food insecurity
3.1%SNAP enrollment
3.3%Transit barriers
4.5%No health insurance
11.5%Frequent mental distress
25.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Creekwood
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 6.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Trent Woods, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Craven County average of 5.4 and in line with the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 2nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 5 eviction filings here over 2 tracked years, with about 1.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.9% of renter households in 2016.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 37049960403
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37049960403?
Census tract 37049960403 in the Creekwood neighborhood scores 1.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 37049960403?
Median gross rent is $1,342/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 37049960403?
1.2% of residents in tract 37049960403 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,086.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 37049960403?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 44th, minority 3th, housing 4th.
Q5
Is tract 37049960403 considered part of Creekwood?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37049960403 fall within Creekwood (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37049960403?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 5 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 37049960403 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.59% of renter households, peaking at 1.9% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 37049960403 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 37049960403 compare to Trent Woods overall?
Tract 37049960403 scores 1.7/10, lower than the parent city of Trent Woods at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Trent Woods; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.