Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally

Bunnlevel Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 37085070600 · Harnett County, NC · pop 4,902 · 14% of tract blocks fall in Bunnlevel

Tract 37085070600 sits in Bunnlevel, NC, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.4/10. Cost burden runs 18% here against 37.3% across Harnett County.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 18% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units2,031
Renter share21.6%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate10.9%
Median income$47,206

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Bunnlevel
Moderate
Within county
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 28 tracts In Harnett County
Low
Within state
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#1,634 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Low
National
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#59,654 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Bunnlevel and the region

Centroid at 35.2978, -78.7852 · click any tract to drill in

Why Bunnlevel scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Bunnlevel
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.9
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
10.9% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$645 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bunnlevel
5.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bunnlevel
6.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bunnlevel
3.2

How Bunnlevel compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Bunnlevel risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.4This tracttract 0706003.2Bunnlevelparent city4.1Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 64

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 416Total filings over 17 yrs
  • 6.85%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.7%Peak (2003)
  • 23Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 37085070600
Filings dropped 21% over the past 17 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Bunnlevel

The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1.2/10. At $645 a month, rents run 33% under what the rest of Bunnlevel commands.

On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.3/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.4/10.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 416 filings here across 17 tracked years. The severe-burden share is 9%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. It sits 0.7 points below the Harnett County average of 4.1.

The worst year on record was 2003, when 13.7% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 6.8% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #59,654 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

At 22% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 6.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $47,206, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 37085070600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37085070600?

Census tract 37085070600 in Bunnlevel scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37085070600?

Median gross rent is $645/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 18% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37085070600?

10.9% of residents in tract 37085070600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,902.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37085070600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 68th, household 85th, minority 66th, housing 26th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37085070600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 416 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 37085070600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.85% of renter households, peaking at 13.7% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 37085070600 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 37085070600 compare to Bunnlevel overall?

Tract 37085070600 scores 3.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Bunnlevel at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bunnlevel; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related