Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally
Bunnlevel Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 37085070600 · Harnett County, NC · pop 4,902 · 14% of tract blocks fall in Bunnlevel
For landlords sizing up Bunnlevel in Harnett County, census tract 37085070600 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.3/10. It lands near the 18th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
18% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $645 a month while the average household earns $47,206 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 22% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 18%
Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units2,031
Renter share21.6%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate10.9%
Median income$47,206
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
44
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
42
th percentile
Moderate
National
39
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Bunnlevel and the region
Centroid at 35.2978, -78.7852 · click any tract to drill in
Why Bunnlevel scores 3.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Bunnlevel
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.9
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
10.9% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$645 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bunnlevel
5.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bunnlevel
6.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bunnlevel
3.2
How Bunnlevel compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 64
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 68%Socioeconomic
- 85%Household composition
- 66%Racial/ethnic minority
- 26%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 416Total filings over 17 yrs
- 6.85%Avg annual filing rate
- 13.7%Peak (2003)
- 23Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 21% over the past 17 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 16.0%Housing insecurity
- 10.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 19.4%Food insecurity
- 16.3%SNAP enrollment
- 10.4%Transit barriers
- 11.1%No health insurance
- 18.4%Frequent mental distress
- 35.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Bunnlevel
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 6.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Bunnlevel, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Harnett County average of 5.2 and below the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 64th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 416 eviction filings here over 17 tracked years, with about 6.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 13.7% of renter households in 2003.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 37085070600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37085070600?
Census tract 37085070600 in Bunnlevel scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 37085070600?
Median gross rent is $645/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 18% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 37085070600?
10.9% of residents in tract 37085070600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,902.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 37085070600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 68th, household 85th, minority 66th, housing 26th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37085070600?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 416 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 37085070600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.85% of renter households, peaking at 13.7% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 37085070600 struggle to pay rent?
About 16.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 37085070600 compare to Bunnlevel overall?
Tract 37085070600 scores 3.4/10, higher than the parent city of Bunnlevel at 1.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bunnlevel; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related