Census Tract · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally
Tract 37127011502 Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 37127011502 ·
Nash County, NC · pop 4,227
Census tract 37127011502 covers part of Nash County, NC, and scores 3.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,227 residents. Cost burden runs 17% here against 35.3% across Nash County.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%Stable renters 22%Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units1,378
Renter share25.8%
SVI overall0.72
Poverty rate12.4%
Median income$65,278
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
54th percentile
#12 of 25 tracts In Nash County
Moderate
Within state
45th percentile
#1,478 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Moderate
National
33th percentile
#56,048 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Nash County and the region
Centroid at 35.8623, -78.1715 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 37127011502 scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
2.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
12.4% poverty · this tract
3.1
Supply constraint
$948 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
State baseline
2.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Tract 37127011502 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 72
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
13.8%Housing insecurity
8.3%Utility-shutoff threat
17.5%Food insecurity
13.3%SNAP enrollment
9.0%Transit barriers
14.0%No health insurance
17.9%Frequent mental distress
35.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tract 37127011502
The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.8/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.3/10. Well under the midpoint, local political climate reads 2.3/10.
9% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the national scale it lands near the 33rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $65,278, an unusually wide affordability cushion. It tracks the Nash County average of 3.7 closely.
Average gross rent runs $948 a month. 26% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 37127011502
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37127011502?
Census tract 37127011502 in Nash County scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 37127011502?
Median gross rent is $948/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 17% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 37127011502?
12.4% of residents in tract 37127011502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,227.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 37127011502?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 72th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 72th, household 67th, minority 63th, housing 59th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 37127011502 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.