Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally

Silver Lake Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 37129012110 · New Hanover County, NC · pop 4,631

With a score of 3.6/10, tract 37129012110 in Silver Lake, NC reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,631 residents. Cost burden runs 62% here against 48.2% across New Hanover County.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 8% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,998
Renter share21.9%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate12.2%
Median income$90,625

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Silver Lake
Moderate
Within county
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#27 of 54 tracts In New Hanover County
Moderate
Within state
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#1,478 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Moderate
National
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#56,048 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Silver Lake and the region

Centroid at 34.1389, -77.9053 · click any tract to drill in

Why Silver Lake scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Silver Lake
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
12.2% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$1,298 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Silver Lake
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Silver Lake
4.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Silver Lake
7.2

How Silver Lake compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Silver Lake risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.6This tracttract 0121104.0Silver Lakeparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county4.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Silver Lake

The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 9/10. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8/10.

16% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.3/10. Average gross rent is $1,298, 8% below the Silver Lake average.

That is riskier than roughly 33% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 22% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

Social vulnerability reads 5.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $90,625, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

It tracks the New Hanover County average of 4.0 closely.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 37129012110

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37129012110?

Census tract 37129012110 in Silver Lake scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37129012110?

Median gross rent is $1,298/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37129012110?

12.2% of residents in tract 37129012110 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,631.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37129012110?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 63th, minority 30th, housing 34th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 37129012110 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 37129012110 compare to Silver Lake overall?

Tract 37129012110 scores 3.6/10, lower than the parent city of Silver Lake at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Silver Lake; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related