Tract 37139960503 Eviction Risk: Lower

What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 8.9/10. Cost burden runs 62% here against 49.2% across Pasquotank County. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.2/10.

The voucher gap is 26.3%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.3/10.

Court records carry 227 eviction filings across 9 observed years. It sits 0.8 points below the Pasquotank County average of 4.0.

Filings peaked in 2002 at 13.1% of renter households. In a typical year about 8.4% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 12% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5/10.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Average gross rent runs $1,505 a month.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.