Census Tract · Ranked #72,539 of 84,120 nationally
Surrey Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 38101010800 ·
Ward County, ND · pop 4,842 · 8% of tract blocks fall in Surrey
How risky is Surrey for landlords? Census tract 38101010800 scores 3.6/10, the Lower tier. On the national scale it ranks #78,890 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 43% of renter households, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,124 a month against an average household income of $92,455 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 25% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%Stable renters 14%Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,819
Renter share25.1%
SVI overall0.38
Poverty rate6.1%
Median income$92,455
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Surrey
Moderate
Within county
13th percentile
#14 of 16 tracts In Ward County
Very Low
Within state
17th percentile
#190 of 228 tracts In North Dakota
Very Low
National
14th percentile
#72,539 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Surrey and the region
Centroid at 48.3565, -101.2633 · click any tract to drill in
Why Surrey scores 2.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Surrey
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.8
State political climate
North Dakota legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
6.1% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$1,124 rent vs county FMR
5.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Surrey
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Surrey
2.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Surrey
1.5
How Surrey compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 38
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.8%Housing insecurity
5.7%Utility-shutoff threat
9.7%Food insecurity
6.0%SNAP enrollment
6.1%Transit barriers
6.6%No health insurance
14.7%Frequent mental distress
25.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Surrey
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 5.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Surrey eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Ward County average of 3.9 and above the North Dakota statewide average of 3.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 38th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 38101010800
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 38101010800?
Census tract 38101010800 in Surrey scores 2.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 38101010800?
Median gross rent is $1,124/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 38101010800?
6.1% of residents in tract 38101010800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,842.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 38101010800?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 38th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 41th, minority 27th, housing 62th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 38101010800 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 38101010800 compare to Surrey overall?
Tract 38101010800 scores 2.1/10, higher than the parent city of Surrey at 1.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Surrey eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.