Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally
Roaming Shores Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 39007001001 · Ashtabula County, OH · pop 5,302 · 30% of tract blocks fall in Roaming Shores
Census tract 39007001001 belongs to Roaming Shores, Ohio. It is home to 5,302 residents and scores 4.7/10, a moderate reading for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #60,465 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 52% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 36% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $885 a month against an average household income of $71,532 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 11% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 5%
Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units2,233
Renter share11.3%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate10.5%
Median income$71,532
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
7
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
39
th percentile
Low
National
31
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Roaming Shores and the region
Centroid at 41.6536, -80.9098 · click any tract to drill in
Why Roaming Shores scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Roaming Shores
4.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
10.5% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$885 rent vs county FMR
4.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Roaming Shores
1.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Roaming Shores
1.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Roaming Shores
2.3
How Roaming Shores compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 39
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 37%Socioeconomic
- 38%Household composition
- 9%Racial/ethnic minority
- 62%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 89Total filings over 15 yrs
- 2.15%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.0%Peak (2005)
- 4Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 20% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.1%Housing insecurity
- 7.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.6%Food insecurity
- 10.4%SNAP enrollment
- 7.1%Transit barriers
- 7.3%No health insurance
- 18.3%Frequent mental distress
- 30.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Roaming Shores
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 4.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Roaming Shores, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Ashtabula County average of 5.4 and below the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 39th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 89 eviction filings here over 15 tracked years, with about 2.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.0% of renter households in 2005.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 39007001001
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39007001001?
Census tract 39007001001 in Roaming Shores scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39007001001?
Median gross rent is $885/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39007001001?
10.5% of residents in tract 39007001001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,302.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39007001001?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 38th, minority 9th, housing 62th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39007001001?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 89 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 39007001001 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.15% of renter households, peaking at 3.0% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 39007001001 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 39007001001 compare to Roaming Shores overall?
Tract 39007001001 scores 3/10, higher than the parent city of Roaming Shores at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Roaming Shores; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related