Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Roaming Shores Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 39007001001 · Ashtabula County, OH · pop 5,302 · 30% of tract blocks fall in Roaming Shores

39007001001 is a census tract in Roaming Shores, OH. It scores 3/10 for landlords. It is home to 5,302 residents. Severe burden reaches 36%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 5% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units2,233
Renter share11.3%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate10.5%
Median income$71,532

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Roaming Shores
Moderate
Within county
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#26 of 28 tracts In Ashtabula County
Very Low
Within state
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#2,197 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Low
National
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Roaming Shores and the region

Centroid at 41.6536, -80.9098 · click any tract to drill in

Why Roaming Shores scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Roaming Shores
4.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
10.5% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$885 rent vs county FMR
4.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Roaming Shores
1.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Roaming Shores
1.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Roaming Shores
2.3

How Roaming Shores compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Roaming Shores risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0010013.2Roaming Shoresparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 89Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 2.15%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.0%Peak (2005)
  • 4Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 39007001001
Filings dropped 20% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Roaming Shores

The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1.7/10. At $885 a month, rents run 27% under what the rest of Roaming Shores commands.

Well under the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 1.8/10. Against Ashtabula County at 44.4%, about half of renters here are cost-burdened. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.2/10.

It sits 1.2 points below the Ashtabula County average of 4.2. The filing record is not thin: 89 evictions over 15 years of observation.

The worst year on record was 2005, when 3.0% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 2.1% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 11% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Rent consumes only 15% of average household income of $71,532, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the OH average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 39007001001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39007001001?

Census tract 39007001001 in Roaming Shores scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39007001001?

Median gross rent is $885/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39007001001?

10.5% of residents in tract 39007001001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,302.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39007001001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 38th, minority 9th, housing 62th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39007001001?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 89 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 39007001001 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.15% of renter households, peaking at 3.0% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 39007001001 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 39007001001 compare to Roaming Shores overall?

Tract 39007001001 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Roaming Shores at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Roaming Shores; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related