Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,017 of 84,120 nationally

Cambridge Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Euclid

Tract 39035152605 · Cuyahoga County, OH · pop 4,885 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Census tract 39035152605 covers the Cambridge Hills area of Euclid, home to 4,885 residents. For landlords it grades $1/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than about 74% of US census tracts.

37% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $902 monthly, set against $46,199 in average yearly household income, roughly 23% of income at the averages. Renters make up 59% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 37% Owners 41%
Tract context
Occupied units2,364
Renter share59.1%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate17.3%
Median income$46,199

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Cambridge Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 15 tracts In Euclid
Elevated
Within county
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#171 of 427 tracts In Cuyahoga County
Elevated
Within state
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#783 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Euclid and the region

Centroid at 41.5793, -81.5206 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cambridge Hills scores 4.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Euclid
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
17.3% poverty · this tract
4.3
Supply constraint
$902 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Euclid
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Euclid
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Euclid
7.1

How Cambridge Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cambridge Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.84.8This tracttract 152605Euclid: 2.92.9Euclidparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 93

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cambridge Hills

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Euclid eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Cuyahoga County average of 5.8 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 19.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 15.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 93rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39035152605

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39035152605?

Census tract 39035152605 in the Cambridge Hills neighborhood scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39035152605?

Median gross rent is $902/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39035152605?

17.3% of residents in tract 39035152605 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,885.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39035152605?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 98th, minority 84th, housing 90th.
Q5

Is tract 39035152605 considered part of Cambridge Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39035152605 fall within Cambridge Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 39035152605 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 39035152605 compare to Euclid overall?

Tract 39035152605 scores 4.8/10, higher than the parent city of Euclid at 2.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Euclid eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 39035152605 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Euclid

Top eight tracts in Euclid ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related