Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #13,119 of 84,120 nationally

Framingham Eviction Risk: Moderate , Columbus

Tract 39049007534 · Franklin County, OH · pop 3,681 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

How risky is the Framingham area of Columbus for landlords? Census tract 39049007534 scores 6.1/10, the Elevated tier. It lands near the 77th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

54% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 10% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $991 a month while the average household earns $39,712 a year, roughly 30% of income at the averages. About 61% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 33% Stable renters 28% Owners 39%
Tract context
Occupied units1,380
Renter share60.9%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate29.5%
Median income$39,712

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Framingham
Very High
Within parent city
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#28 of 238 tracts In Columbus
High
Within county
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#29 of 328 tracts In Franklin County
Very High
Within state
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#159 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Columbus and the region

Centroid at 40.0326, -82.9465 · click any tract to drill in

Why Framingham scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Columbus
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
29.5% poverty · this tract
7.4
Supply constraint
$991 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Columbus
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Columbus
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Columbus
4.0

How Framingham compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Framingham risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.95.9This tracttract 007534Columbus: 3.13.1Columbusparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 96

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 442Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 5.05%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.5%Peak (2010)
  • 41Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390490075342002: 27 filings (3.87/100 renter HHs)2003: 39 filings (5.60/100 renter HHs)2004: 31 filings (4.45/100 renter HHs)2005: 25 filings (4.13/100 renter HHs)2006: 30 filings (4.95/100 renter HHs)2007: 36 filings (5.94/100 renter HHs)2008: 34 filings (5.61/100 renter HHs)2009: 28 filings (4.62/100 renter HHs)2010: 49 filings (6.46/100 renter HHs)2011: 36 filings (5.03/100 renter HHs)2012: 35 filings (4.89/100 renter HHs)2013: 31 filings (4.33/100 renter HHs)2015: 41 filings (5.73/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 52% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 213Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.87×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2020-11-01: 6 filings (3.59× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-03-01: 8 filings (1.85× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (1.20× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 5 filings (0.94× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (1.80× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2022-01-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2022-02-01: 11 filings (2.75× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (3.01× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (1.80× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2022-11-01: 6 filings (3.59× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2023-01-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2023-02-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-11-01: 12 filings (7.19× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (1.39× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (0.94× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2025-01-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (2.40× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Columbus, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Framingham. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Framingham

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 7.4/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Columbus eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Franklin County average of 5.4 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.87x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 96th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39049007534

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39049007534?

Census tract 39049007534 in the Framingham neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39049007534?

Median gross rent is $991/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39049007534?

29.5% of residents in tract 39049007534 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,681.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39049007534?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 69th, minority 88th, housing 87th.
Q5

Is tract 39049007534 considered part of Framingham?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39049007534 fall within Framingham (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39049007534?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 442 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 39049007534 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.05% of renter households, peaking at 6.5% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39049007534 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.87× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Columbus eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39049007534 struggle to pay rent?

About 32.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 25.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39049007534 compare to Columbus overall?

Tract 39049007534 scores 5.9/10, higher than the parent city of Columbus at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Columbus eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 39049007534 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Columbus

Top eight tracts in Columbus ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related