Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #77,226 of 84,120 nationally

Fruit Hill Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 39061025002 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 6,916 · 43% of tract blocks fall in Fruit Hill

Census tract 39061025002 belongs to Fruit Hill, Ohio. It is home to 6,916 residents and scores 4.4/10, a moderate reading for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

32% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,054 a month against an average household income of $113,438 a year, roughly 11% of income at the averages. About 7% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 5% Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units2,560
Renter share7.4%
SVI overall0.02
Poverty rate5.6%
Median income$113,438

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Fruit Hill
Moderate
Within county
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#203 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Very Low
Within state
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#2,870 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very Low
National
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#77,226 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fruit Hill and the region

Centroid at 39.0644, -84.3875 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fruit Hill scores 1.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fruit Hill
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
5.6% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,054 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fruit Hill
1.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fruit Hill
2.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fruit Hill
2.1

How Fruit Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fruit Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.71.7This tracttract 025002Fruit Hill: 2.62.6Fruit Hillparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 2

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 165Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 6.66%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.6%Peak (2010)
  • 10Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610250022002: 6 filings (3.61/100 renter HHs)2003: 10 filings (6.02/100 renter HHs)2004: 7 filings (4.22/100 renter HHs)2005: 15 filings (13.39/100 renter HHs)2006: 10 filings (8.93/100 renter HHs)2007: 14 filings (12.50/100 renter HHs)2008: 10 filings (8.93/100 renter HHs)2009: 13 filings (11.61/100 renter HHs)2010: 18 filings (7.63/100 renter HHs)2011: 9 filings (4.52/100 renter HHs)2012: 11 filings (5.53/100 renter HHs)2013: 11 filings (5.53/100 renter HHs)2014: 10 filings (5.03/100 renter HHs)2015: 6 filings (3.02/100 renter HHs)2016: 5 filings (2.02/100 renter HHs)2018: 10 filings (4.03/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 67% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 49Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (2.50× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (5.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (2.50× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (7.50× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (3.33× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fruit Hill

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 3.2/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fruit Hill, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and below the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 2nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061025002

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061025002?

Census tract 39061025002 in Fruit Hill scores 1.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061025002?

Median gross rent is $1,054/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061025002?

5.6% of residents in tract 39061025002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,916.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061025002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 41th, minority 12th, housing 2th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061025002?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 165 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061025002 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.66% of renter households, peaking at 7.6% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 39061025002 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.00× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 39061025002 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 39061025002 compare to Fruit Hill overall?

Tract 39061025002 scores 1.7/10, lower than the parent city of Fruit Hill at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fruit Hill; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related