Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #80,791 of 84,120 nationally

Terrace Park Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 39061027300 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 2,542 · 38% of tract blocks fall in Terrace Park

For landlords sizing up Terrace Park in Hamilton County, census tract 39061027300 carries a lower eviction-risk score of 3.9/10. It lands near the 10th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 13% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,875 a month against an average household income of $176,250 a year, roughly 13% of income at the averages. Renters make up 6% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 5% Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units867
Renter share6.0%
SVI overall0.00
Poverty rate2.4%
Median income$176,250

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Terrace Park
Moderate
Within county
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#213 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Very Low
Within state
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#3,016 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very Low
National
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#80,791 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Terrace Park and the region

Centroid at 39.1966, -84.2876 · click any tract to drill in

Why Terrace Park scores 1.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Terrace Park
3.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
2.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,875 rent vs county FMR
9.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Terrace Park
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Terrace Park
2.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Terrace Park
1.5

How Terrace Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Terrace Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.31.3This tracttract 027300Terrace Park: 2.02.0Terrace Parkparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 0

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 18Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 4.13%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.4%Peak (2008)
  • 1Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610273002002: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2003: 1 filings (1.20/100 renter HHs)2004: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2005: 2 filings (4.13/100 renter HHs)2006: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2007: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2008: 6 filings (12.38/100 renter HHs)2009: 2 filings (4.13/100 renter HHs)2010: 2 filings (2.25/100 renter HHs)2011: 1 filings (1.79/100 renter HHs)2012: 3 filings (5.36/100 renter HHs)2013: 1 filings (1.79/100 renter HHs)2014: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2015: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2016: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2018: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 10Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.67×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Terrace Park

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 9.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Terrace Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and below the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 4.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 18 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 4.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 12.4% of renter households in 2008.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061027300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061027300?

Census tract 39061027300 in Terrace Park scores 1.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061027300?

Median gross rent is $1,875/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 13% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061027300?

2.4% of residents in tract 39061027300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,542.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061027300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 0th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 8th, minority 11th, housing 1th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061027300?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 18 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 39061027300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.13% of renter households, peaking at 12.4% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 39061027300 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.67× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 39061027300 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 39061027300 compare to Terrace Park overall?

Tract 39061027300 scores 1.3/10, lower than the parent city of Terrace Park at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Terrace Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related