Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Tract 40083600502 Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 40083600502 ·
Logan County, OK · pop 5,767
Tract 40083600502 sits in Logan County, OK, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. Population here is 5,767. Against Logan County at 32.0%, 17% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 50% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%Stable renters 5%Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units2,183
Renter share6.6%
SVI overall0.37
Poverty rate7.2%
Median income$92,778
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
0th percentile
#13 of 13 tracts In Logan County
Very Low
Within state
35th percentile
#781 of 1,205 tracts In Oklahoma
Low
National
20th percentile
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Logan County and the region
Centroid at 35.7623, -97.3755 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 40083600502 scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
1.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.6
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
7.2% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
State baseline
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Tract 40083600502 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 37
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
10.8%Housing insecurity
7.9%Utility-shutoff threat
12.9%Food insecurity
10.1%SNAP enrollment
7.1%Transit barriers
8.4%No health insurance
17.0%Frequent mental distress
33.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tract 40083600502
The main counterweight is state political climate at 1.5/10. Well under the midpoint, local political climate reads 1.5/10.
On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10. 17% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
It sits 1.0 points below the Logan County average of 4.0. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 7% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Model confidence here is 50%, lower than typical because some ACS inputs for this tract carry wide margins of error, so read the score as a band, not a point.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 40083600502
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40083600502?
Census tract 40083600502 in Logan County scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 40083600502?
7.2% of residents in tract 40083600502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,767.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 40083600502?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 37th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 73th, minority 24th, housing 51th.
Q4
What share of households in tract 40083600502 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.