Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally
Barnsdall Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 40113940008 · Osage County, OK · pop 3,092 · 20% of tract blocks fall in Barnsdall
Census tract 40113940008 covers part of Barnsdall, OK, and scores 3.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,092. Against Osage County at 29.1%, 15% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%
Stable renters 15%
Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units1,053
Renter share17.9%
SVI overall0.60
Poverty rate9.5%
Median income$65,592
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
42
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
43
th percentile
Moderate
National
27
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Barnsdall and the region
Centroid at 36.5253, -96.1377 · click any tract to drill in
Why Barnsdall scores 3.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Barnsdall
3.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.0
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
9.5% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$723 rent vs county FMR
1.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Barnsdall
2.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Barnsdall
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Barnsdall
4.0
How Barnsdall compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 60
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 45%Socioeconomic
- 66%Household composition
- 52%Racial/ethnic minority
- 67%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.0%Housing insecurity
- 9.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 17.2%Food insecurity
- 14.6%SNAP enrollment
- 9.3%Transit barriers
- 9.2%No health insurance
- 18.2%Frequent mental distress
- 41.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Barnsdall
The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1.1/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.6/10.
Nationally it ranks #61,558 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 18% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Against average income of $65,592, annual rent is just 13%. It tracks the Osage County average of 3.6 closely.
Average gross rent is $723, close to the Barnsdall average.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 40113940008
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40113940008?
Census tract 40113940008 in Barnsdall scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 40113940008?
Median gross rent is $723/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 15% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 40113940008?
9.5% of residents in tract 40113940008 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,092.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 40113940008?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 60th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 66th, minority 52th, housing 67th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 40113940008 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 40113940008 compare to Barnsdall overall?
Tract 40113940008 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of Barnsdall at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Barnsdall; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related