Forest Orchard Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tulsa

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10. This is renter territory: 70% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The poverty rate is 21%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.4/10.

Against the Tulsa County average of 3.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points. At $878 a month, rents run 17% under what the rest of Tulsa commands. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Tulsa. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

On the national scale it lands near the 55th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 7.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the OK average is 3.8, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. 44% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.