Sonoma-Louisville Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa
Tract 40143004101 · Tulsa County, OK · pop 2,484 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
40143004101 is a census tract in the Sonoma-Louisville area of Tulsa, OK. It scores 3/10 for landlords. It is home to 2,484 residents. 43% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Tulsa and the region
Centroid at 36.1116, -95.9492 · click any tract to drill in
Why Sonoma-Louisville scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Sonoma-Louisville compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 0
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 1%Socioeconomic
- 8%Household composition
- 16%Racial/ethnic minority
- 1%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 38%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Sonoma-Louisville. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.7%Housing insecurity
- 3.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.9%Food insecurity
- 3.3%SNAP enrollment
- 3.4%Transit barriers
- 3.7%No health insurance
- 11.6%Frequent mental distress
- 27.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Sonoma-Louisville
78% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well clear of the Tulsa County average of 40.3%. The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 10/10. Average gross rent is $1,809, 72% above the Tulsa average.
The voucher gap is 53.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10.
On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10. SNAP participation runs 3.3% against 15.2% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.7% against 11.3% nationally.
It sits 0.7 points below the Tulsa County average of 3.7. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 3% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 40143004101
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40143004101?
What is the average rent in tract 40143004101?
What is the poverty rate in tract 40143004101?
How socially vulnerable is tract 40143004101?
Is tract 40143004101 considered part of Sonoma-Louisville?
What share of households in tract 40143004101 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 40143004101 compare to Tulsa overall?
Was tract 40143004101 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Tulsa
Top eight tracts in Tulsa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.