Shadow Mountain Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa

The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10.

At $1,357 a month, rents run 29% over what the rest of Tulsa commands. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

Food insecurity runs 9.0% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 6.5% against 15.2% nationally. The voucher gap is 15.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

It sits 0.7 points below the Tulsa County average of 3.7. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 21% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Against average income of $115,857, annual rent is just 14%.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.