Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #34,332 of 84,120 nationally

Green Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Portland

Tract 41051006900 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 2,862 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 41051006900 runs through the Green Hills area of Portland. With 2,862 residents, it scores 6.8/10 for landlords. It lands near the 91st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 37% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 11% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,375 monthly, set against $212,768 in average yearly household income, roughly 13% of income at the averages. Renters make up 17% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 10% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,259
Renter share16.7%
SVI overall0.18
Poverty rate7.4%
Median income$212,768

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Green Hills
Very Low
Within parent city
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#147 of 168 tracts In Portland
Very Low
Within county
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#158 of 197 tracts In Multnomah County
Very Low
Within state
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#582 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Portland and the region

Centroid at 45.5082, -122.7310 · click any tract to drill in

Why Green Hills scores 4.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
7.4% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$2,375 rent vs county FMR
6.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5

How Green Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Green Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.44.4This tracttract 006900Portland: 8.18.1Portlandparent cityCounty: 5.35.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 18

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 39Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 2.82%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.1%Peak (2004)
  • 1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 410510069002000: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2001: 1 filings (1.13/100 renter HHs)2002: 5 filings (5.66/100 renter HHs)2003: 1 filings (1.13/100 renter HHs)2004: 8 filings (9.06/100 renter HHs)2005: 4 filings (2.24/100 renter HHs)2006: 2 filings (1.12/100 renter HHs)2007: 2 filings (1.12/100 renter HHs)2008: 4 filings (2.24/100 renter HHs)2009: 2 filings (1.12/100 renter HHs)2010: 2 filings (1.71/100 renter HHs)2012: 6 filings (7.69/100 renter HHs)2013: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2014: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2015: 1 filings (1.28/100 renter HHs)2016: 1 filings (1.09/100 renter HHs)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 239Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 39.83×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 10 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Green Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Green Hills

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Portland eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Multnomah County average of 6.9 and above the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 39 eviction filings here over 13 tracked years, with about 2.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 9.1% of renter households in 2004.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 18th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 41051006900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051006900?

Census tract 41051006900 in the Green Hills neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41051006900?

Median gross rent is $2,375/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41051006900?

7.4% of residents in tract 41051006900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,862.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41051006900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 18th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 39th, minority 30th, housing 36th.
Q5

Is tract 41051006900 considered part of Green Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051006900 fall within Green Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051006900?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 39 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 41051006900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.82% of renter households, peaking at 9.1% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 41051006900 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 39.83× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 41051006900 compare to Portland overall?

Tract 41051006900 scores 4.4/10, lower than the parent city of Portland at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 41051006900 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Portland

Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related