Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #11,988 of 84,120 nationally

Corliss Eviction Risk: Elevated , Ingram

Tract 42003202200 · Allegheny County, PA · pop 2,548 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Tract 42003202200 sits in the Corliss area of Pittsburgh eviction risk, PA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 7.2/10. Cost burden runs 15% here against 40.6% across Allegheny County.

Risk score
7.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 25% Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units1,220
Renter share29.2%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate17.0%
Median income$54,440

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Corliss
Very High
Within parent city
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#46 of 128 tracts In Ingram
Elevated
Within county
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#74 of 394 tracts In Allegheny County
High
Within state
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#339 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Ingram and the region

Centroid at 40.4541, -80.0636 · click any tract to drill in

Why Corliss scores 7.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Ingram
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
17.0% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$690 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ingram
4.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ingram
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ingram
6.0

How Corliss compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Corliss risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.2This tracttract 2022004.4Ingramparent city5.0Countyavg tract in county4.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 256Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 10.03%Avg annual filing rate
  • 11.6%Peak (2000)
  • 37Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 42003202200
Filings dropped 18% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Corliss. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Corliss

At $690 a month, rents run 45% under what the rest of Pittsburgh commands. The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1/10.

Against the Allegheny County average of 5.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.2 points. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 7.8/10. The filing record is not thin: 256 evictions over 7 years of observation.

The worst year on record was 2000, when 11.6% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Pittsburgh. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 10.0% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #11,988 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 4.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Against average income of $54,440, annual rent is just 15%.

Statewide the PA average is 4.6, so this tract runs 2.6 points hotter. 29% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 42003202200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42003202200?

Census tract 42003202200 in the Corliss neighborhood scores 7.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42003202200?

Median gross rent is $690/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 15% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42003202200?

17.0% of residents in tract 42003202200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,548.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42003202200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 36th, household 46th, minority 60th, housing 35th.
Q5

Is tract 42003202200 considered part of Corliss?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42003202200 fall within Corliss (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42003202200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 256 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42003202200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.03% of renter households, peaking at 11.6% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 42003202200 compare to Ingram overall?

Tract 42003202200 scores 7.2/10, higher than the parent city of Ingram at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ingram; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 42003202200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Ingram

Top eight tracts in Ingram ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related