Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,522 of 84,120 nationally
Corliss Eviction Risk: Moderate , Ingram
Tract 42003202200 · Allegheny County, PA · pop 2,548 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Census tract 42003202200 covers the Corliss area of Ingram, home to 2,548 residents. For landlords it grades 5.1/10, a moderate reading. That is riskier than about 41% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 15% of renter households, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $690 a month while the average household earns $54,440 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. Renters make up 29% of occupied homes.
Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 25%
Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units1,220
Renter share29.2%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate17.0%
Median income$54,440
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
65
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
79
th percentile
High
Within state
84
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Ingram and the region
Centroid at 40.4541, -80.0636 · click any tract to drill in
Why Corliss scores 5.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Ingram
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
17.0% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$690 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ingram
4.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ingram
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ingram
6.0
How Corliss compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 39
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 36%Socioeconomic
- 46%Household composition
- 60%Racial/ethnic minority
- 35%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 71%Grade B
- 28%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 256Total filings over 7 yrs
- 10.03%Avg annual filing rate
- 11.6%Peak (2000)
- 37Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 18% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Corliss. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Corliss
The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Ingram, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Allegheny County average of 5.6 and below the Pennsylvania statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 256 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 10.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 11.6% of renter households in 2000.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 42003202200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42003202200?
Census tract 42003202200 in the Corliss neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 42003202200?
Median gross rent is $690/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 15% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 42003202200?
17.0% of residents in tract 42003202200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,548.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 42003202200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 36th, household 46th, minority 60th, housing 35th.
Q5
Is tract 42003202200 considered part of Corliss?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42003202200 fall within Corliss (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42003202200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 256 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42003202200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.03% of renter households, peaking at 11.6% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
How does tract 42003202200 compare to Ingram overall?
Tract 42003202200 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Ingram at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ingram; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 42003202200 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Ingram
Top eight tracts in Ingram ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · PA
North Oakland
7.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · PA
South Oakland
7.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · PA
East Hills
7.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · PA
Oakland
7.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · PA
Bellefield
7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · PA
Belmar
7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · PA
Central Oakland
7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · PA
Homewood South
7
/ 10 · Elevated
Related