Census Tract · Ranked #65,113 of 84,120 nationally
Leetsdale Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 42003448000 ·
Allegheny County, PA · pop 1,125
The Moderate-tier score of 4.8/10 for census tract 42003448000 reflects conditions in Leetsdale, Pennsylvania. That is riskier than roughly 31% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 27% of renter households, a moderate level, and 5% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $963 monthly, set against $65,368 in average yearly household income, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 47% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%Stable renters 34%Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units579
Renter share46.8%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate4.0%
Median income$65,368
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Leetsdale
Moderate
Within county
24th percentile
#298 of 394 tracts In Allegheny County
Low
Within state
29th percentile
#2,459 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Low
National
23th percentile
#65,113 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Leetsdale and the region
Centroid at 40.5639, -80.2160 · click any tract to drill in
Why Leetsdale scores 2.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Leetsdale
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
4.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$963 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Leetsdale
4.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Leetsdale
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Leetsdale
3.5
How Leetsdale compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 23
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
21%Socioeconomic
54%Household composition
36%Racial/ethnic minority
20%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
15%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Leetsdale, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Allegheny County average of 5.6 and below the Pennsylvania statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 15% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 23rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 42003448000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42003448000?
Census tract 42003448000 in Leetsdale scores 2.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 42003448000?
Median gross rent is $963/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 42003448000?
4.0% of residents in tract 42003448000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,125.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 42003448000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 54th, minority 36th, housing 20th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42003448000?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 46 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42003448000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.32% of renter households, peaking at 5.4% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
How does tract 42003448000 compare to Leetsdale overall?
Tract 42003448000 scores 2.6/10, lower than the parent city of Leetsdale at 3.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Leetsdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7
Was tract 42003448000 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 15% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.