Neighborhood · Ranked #57,812 of 84,120 nationally
Overbrook Eviction Risk: Lower , Brentwood
Tract 42003479000 ·
Allegheny County, PA · pop 1,962 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
42003479000 is a census tract in the Overbrook area of Allegheny County, PA. It scores 3.5/10 for landlords. It is home to 1,962 residents. 30% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%Stable renters 2%Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units843
Renter share4.4%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate3.1%
Median income$83,393
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
20th percentile
#5 of 6 tracts In Overbrook
Low
Within county
29th percentile
#280 of 394 tracts In Allegheny County
Low
Within state
33th percentile
#2,304 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Low
National
31th percentile
#57,812 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Brentwood and the region
Centroid at 40.3801, -80.0143 · click any tract to drill in
Why Overbrook scores 3.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Brentwood
3.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
3.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$941 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Brentwood
3.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Brentwood
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Brentwood
5.0
How Overbrook compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 6
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
11%Socioeconomic
45%Household composition
1%Racial/ethnic minority
5%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
7%Grade B
1%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. It sits 1.5 points below the Allegheny County average of 5.0.
On the high side, court filing pressure reads 7.8/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.4/10.
46% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Allegheny County average of 40.6%. The filing record is not thin: 6 evictions over 4 years of observation.
The worst year on record was 2002, when 4.8% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 3.7% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 31% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 4% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 42003479000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42003479000?
Census tract 42003479000 in the Overbrook neighborhood scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 42003479000?
Median gross rent is $941/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 42003479000?
3.1% of residents in tract 42003479000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,962.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 42003479000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 11th, household 45th, minority 1th, housing 5th.
Q5
Is tract 42003479000 considered part of Overbrook?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42003479000 fall within Overbrook (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42003479000?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 6 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 42003479000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.74% of renter households, peaking at 4.8% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
How does tract 42003479000 compare to Brentwood overall?
Tract 42003479000 scores 3.5/10, lower than the parent city of Brentwood at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Brentwood; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 42003479000 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.