Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Westwood Village Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 42041010201 ·
Cumberland County, PA · pop 4,795 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
With a score of 3/10, tract 42041010201 in the Westwood Village area of Cumberland County, PA reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,795. Cost burden runs 22% here against 35.8% across Cumberland County.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%Stable renters 4%Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units2,049
Renter share5.5%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate1.0%
Median income$110,407
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Westwood Village
Moderate
Within county
20th percentile
#44 of 55 tracts In Cumberland County
Low
Within state
19th percentile
#2,785 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Very Low
National
20th percentile
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cumberland County and the region
Centroid at 40.3050, -76.9494 · click any tract to drill in
Why Westwood Village scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
3.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
1.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,161 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
State baseline
3.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Westwood Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
22%Socioeconomic
5%Household composition
9%Racial/ethnic minority
4%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
3%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
3Total filings over 2 yrs
0.92%Avg annual filing rate
1.2%Peak (2000)
1Filings in 2004 (latest validated)
Filings by year2000 to 2004
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Westwood Village
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 7.6/10. It sits 1.1 points below the Cumberland County average of 4.1.
The filing record is not thin: 3 evictions over 2 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2000 at 1.2% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 0.9% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 5% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 1.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Rent consumes only 13% of average household income of $110,407, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the PA average is 4.6, so this tract runs 1.6 points cooler.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 42041010201
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42041010201?
Census tract 42041010201 in the Westwood Village neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 42041010201?
Median gross rent is $1,161/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 22% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 42041010201?
1.0% of residents in tract 42041010201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,795.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 42041010201?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 22th, household 5th, minority 9th, housing 4th.
Q5
Is tract 42041010201 considered part of Westwood Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42041010201 fall within Westwood Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42041010201?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 42041010201 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.92% of renter households, peaking at 1.2% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Was tract 42041010201 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 3% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.