Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #57,812 of 84,120 nationally

Burholme Eviction Risk: Lower , Cheltenham Village

Tract 42091202201 · Montgomery County, PA · pop 4,912 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 42091202201 covers part of the Burholme area of Cheltenham Village, PA, and scores 3.5/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,912 residents. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.2/10.

Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 15% Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units1,691
Renter share23.4%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate5.0%
Median income$112,986

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Burholme
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Cheltenham Village
Moderate
Within county
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#154 of 219 tracts In Montgomery County
Low
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#2,304 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cheltenham Village and the region

Centroid at 40.0648, -75.1028 · click any tract to drill in

Why Burholme scores 3.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cheltenham Village
8.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
5.0% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,300 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cheltenham Village
2.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cheltenham Village
2.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cheltenham Village
2.4

How Burholme compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Burholme risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.5This tracttract 2022013.7Cheltenham Villageparent city4.3Countyavg tract in county4.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 96Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 3.87%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.6%Peak (2004)
  • 8Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 42091202201
Filings dropped 47% over the past 7 months.
Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Burholme

On the high side, local political climate reads 8.4/10. 35% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Montgomery County average of 42.6%.

On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.2/10. 11% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 96 filings here across 7 tracked years.

It sits 0.8 points below the Montgomery County average of 4.3. At $1,300 a month, rents run 14% under what the rest of Cheltenham Village commands. The worst year on record was 2004, when 5.6% of renter households were served.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 3.9% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 31% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

At 23% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 42091202201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42091202201?

Census tract 42091202201 in the Burholme neighborhood scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42091202201?

Median gross rent is $1,300/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42091202201?

5.0% of residents in tract 42091202201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,912.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42091202201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 33th, household 42th, minority 65th, housing 39th.
Q5

Is tract 42091202201 considered part of Burholme?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42091202201 fall within Burholme (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42091202201?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 96 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42091202201 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.87% of renter households, peaking at 5.6% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 42091202201 compare to Cheltenham Village overall?

Tract 42091202201 scores 3.5/10, right in line with the parent city of Cheltenham Village at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cheltenham Village; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 42091202201 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related