Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #48,956 of 84,120 nationally

Shortridge Eviction Risk: Moderate , Narberth

Tract 42091205600 · Montgomery County, PA · pop 4,478 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

42091205600 is a census tract in the Shortridge area of Narberth, PA. It scores 4/10 for landlords. It is home to 4,478 residents. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.

Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 24% Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units1,953
Renter share43.9%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate1.1%
Median income$119,863

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Shortridge
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Narberth
Moderate
Within county
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#111 of 219 tracts In Montgomery County
Moderate
Within state
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#1,846 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Narberth and the region

Centroid at 40.0077, -75.2635 · click any tract to drill in

Why Shortridge scores 4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Narberth
8.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
1.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,837 rent vs county FMR
5.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Narberth
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Narberth
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Narberth
4.0

How Shortridge compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Shortridge risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.0This tracttract 2056004.6Narberthparent city4.3Countyavg tract in county4.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 6

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 68Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 1.34%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.1%Peak (2000)
  • 9Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 42091205600
Filings dropped 44% over the past 7 months.
Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Shortridge

Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.6/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.4/10.

The severe-burden share is 14%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Court records carry 68 eviction filings across 7 observed years.

The worst year on record was 2000, when 2.1% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Philadelphia. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 1.3% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #48,956 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 1%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 45% of renters.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 42091205600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42091205600?

Census tract 42091205600 in the Shortridge neighborhood scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42091205600?

Median gross rent is $1,837/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42091205600?

1.1% of residents in tract 42091205600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,478.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42091205600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 4th, minority 37th, housing 16th.
Q5

Is tract 42091205600 considered part of Shortridge?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42091205600 fall within Shortridge (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42091205600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 68 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42091205600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.34% of renter households, peaking at 2.1% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 42091205600 compare to Narberth overall?

Tract 42091205600 scores 4/10, lower than the parent city of Narberth at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Narberth; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 42091205600 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related