Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally

Westfield Terrace Eviction Risk: Moderate , New Market

Tract 42133020100 · York County, PA · pop 3,339 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Tract 42133020100 sits in the Westfield Terrace area of New Market, PA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5/10. It is home to 3,339 residents. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.9/10.

Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 15% Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units1,321
Renter share30.8%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate6.7%
Median income$93,083

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Westfield Terrace
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In New Market
Moderate
Within county
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#29 of 108 tracts In York County
Elevated
Within state
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#1,245 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across New Market and the region

Centroid at 40.2134, -76.8722 · click any tract to drill in

Why Westfield Terrace scores 5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from New Market
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.8
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
6.7% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$917 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from New Market
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from New Market
9.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from New Market
7.5

How Westfield Terrace compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Westfield Terrace risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.0This tracttract 0201005.4New Marketparent city4.4Countyavg tract in county4.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 53

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 238Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 7.59%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.8%Peak (2003)
  • 34Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 42133020100
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 7 months.
Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Westfield Terrace

Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 9.2/10. Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Cost burden runs roughly one in two here against 42.6% across York County. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.7/10. Court records carry 238 eviction filings across 7 observed years.

Filings peaked in 2003 at 9.8% of renter households. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Harrisburg. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

In a typical year about 7.6% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #32,842 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.8/10. Rent consumes only 12% of average household income of $93,083, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 42133020100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42133020100?

Census tract 42133020100 in the Westfield Terrace neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42133020100?

Median gross rent is $917/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42133020100?

6.7% of residents in tract 42133020100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,339.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42133020100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 77th, minority 20th, housing 60th.
Q5

Is tract 42133020100 considered part of Westfield Terrace?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42133020100 fall within Westfield Terrace (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42133020100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 238 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42133020100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.59% of renter households, peaking at 9.8% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 42133020100 compare to New Market overall?

Tract 42133020100 scores 5/10, lower than the parent city of New Market at 5.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from New Market; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 42133020100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related