Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,836 of 84,120 nationally

Edgewood Eviction Risk: High , Cranston

Tract 44007000101 · Providence County, RI · pop 4,418 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

With a score of 8/10, tract 44007000101 in the Edgewood area of Providence, RI reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,418. The severe-burden share is 33%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 22% Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units1,399
Renter share39.7%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate25.9%
Median income$46,934

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Edgewood
Very High
Within parent city
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 42 tracts In Cranston
Very High
Within county
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 145 tracts In Providence County
Very High
Within state
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 247 tracts In Rhode Island
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cranston and the region

Centroid at 41.7929, -71.3883 · click any tract to drill in

Why Edgewood scores 8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cranston
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Rhode Island legislature & governorship
5.5
Economic stress
25.9% poverty · this tract
6.5
Supply constraint
$1,191 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cranston
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cranston
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cranston
6.5

How Edgewood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Edgewood risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.08.0This tracttract 000101Cranston: 4.34.3Cranstonparent cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.35.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 54Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 3.95%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.9%Peak (2015)
  • 24Filings in 2016 (latest validated)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 174Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.82×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (1.60× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 8 filings (2.91× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2021-01-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2022-08-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 6 filings (1.85× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2023-01-01: 5 filings (1.82× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 5 filings (3.33× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2023-08-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (1.09× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (2.67× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 8 filings (2.91× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (0.73× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.44× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Portland, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Edgewood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Edgewood

It sits 2.3 points above the Providence County average of 5.7. Food insecurity runs 33.1% against 17.8% nationally. The clearest offset is supply constraint at 2.4/10.

The poverty rate is 26%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 7.5/10.

Running hot, local political climate reads 7.5/10. At $1,191 a month, rents run 15% under what the rest of Providence commands. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 54 filings here across 2 tracked years.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 15.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Filings peaked in 2015 at 4.9% of renter households.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 4.0% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 91st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 44007000101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 44007000101?

Census tract 44007000101 in the Edgewood neighborhood scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 44007000101?

Median gross rent is $1,191/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 44007000101?

25.9% of residents in tract 44007000101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,418.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 44007000101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 86th, household 91th, minority 75th, housing 75th.
Q5

Is tract 44007000101 considered part of Edgewood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 44007000101 fall within Edgewood (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 44007000101?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 54 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 44007000101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.95% of renter households, peaking at 4.9% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 44007000101 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.82× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Portland, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 44007000101 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 44007000101 compare to Cranston overall?

Tract 44007000101 scores 8/10, higher than the parent city of Cranston at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cranston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 44007000101 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cranston

Top eight tracts in Cranston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related