Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally

Fair Play Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 45007010900 · Anderson County, SC · pop 4,089 · 0% of tract blocks fall in Fair Play

Eviction risk in Fair Play centers on tract 45007010900, which scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier) and is home to 4,089 residents. That is riskier than about 10% of US census tracts.

17% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $699 a month while the average household earns $77,377 a year, roughly 11% of income at the averages. About 6% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 5% Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units1,911
Renter share5.6%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate9.6%
Median income$77,377

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Fair Play
Very Low
Within county
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#28 of 51 tracts In Anderson County
Moderate
Within state
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#743 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Moderate
National
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#46,312 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fair Play and the region

Centroid at 34.5210, -82.8802 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fair Play scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fair Play
3.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.9
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
9.6% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$699 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fair Play
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fair Play
1.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fair Play
1.9

How Fair Play compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fair Play risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 010900Fair Play: 2.62.6Fair Playparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 26

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 123Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 9.05%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.5%Peak (2014)
  • 33Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450070109002010: 18 filings (5.62/100 renter HHs)2011: 26 filings (9.81/100 renter HHs)2012: 15 filings (5.66/100 renter HHs)2013: 31 filings (11.70/100 renter HHs)2014: 33 filings (12.45/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 83% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fair Play

What moves this score most is economic stress at 2.4/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fair Play, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Anderson County average of 5.5 and below the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 123 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 9.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 12.5% of renter households in 2014.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 45007010900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45007010900?

Census tract 45007010900 in Fair Play scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45007010900?

Median gross rent is $699/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 17% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45007010900?

9.6% of residents in tract 45007010900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,089.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45007010900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 34th, household 30th, minority 3th, housing 38th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45007010900?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 123 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45007010900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.05% of renter households, peaking at 12.5% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 45007010900 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 45007010900 compare to Fair Play overall?

Tract 45007010900 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Fair Play at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fair Play; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fair Play

Top eight tracts in Fair Play ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related