Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally

Starr Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 45007012200 · Anderson County, SC · pop 6,011 · 8% of tract blocks fall in Starr

Starr in Anderson County anchors census tract 45007012200, which lands at 5.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 52nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

28% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $948 monthly, set against $56,974 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 20% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 15% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units2,184
Renter share20.1%
SVI overall0.69
Poverty rate10.8%
Median income$56,974

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Starr
Moderate
Within county
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#29 of 51 tracts In Anderson County
Moderate
Within state
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#743 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Moderate
National
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#46,312 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Starr and the region

Centroid at 34.3982, -82.7484 · click any tract to drill in

Why Starr scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Starr
3.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.9
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
10.8% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$948 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Starr
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Starr
2.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Starr
8.1

How Starr compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Starr risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 012200Starr: 2.82.8Starrparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 69

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 307Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 14.01%Avg annual filing rate
  • 19.3%Peak (2014)
  • 84Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450070122002010: 58 filings (12.83/100 renter HHs)2011: 65 filings (14.94/100 renter HHs)2012: 48 filings (11.03/100 renter HHs)2013: 52 filings (11.95/100 renter HHs)2014: 84 filings (19.31/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 45% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Starr

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Starr, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Anderson County average of 5.5 and in line with the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 307 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 14.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 19.3% of renter households in 2014.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 69th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45007012200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45007012200?

Census tract 45007012200 in Starr scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45007012200?

Median gross rent is $948/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45007012200?

10.8% of residents in tract 45007012200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,011.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45007012200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 69th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 77th, household 61th, minority 40th, housing 58th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45007012200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 307 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45007012200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.01% of renter households, peaking at 19.3% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 45007012200 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 45007012200 compare to Starr overall?

Tract 45007012200 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Starr at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Starr; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related