Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #78,212 of 84,120 nationally

Waterway Arms Eviction Risk: Lower , Mount Pleasant

Tract 45019004701 · Charleston County, SC · pop 6,617 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Census tract 45019004701 runs through the Waterway Arms neighborhood of Mount Pleasant. With 6,617 residents, it scores 4.9/10 for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 34% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

49% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 33% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,006 a month against an average household income of $114,502 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 21% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 11% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units3,050
Renter share21.0%
SVI overall0.02
Poverty rate4.4%
Median income$114,502

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Waterway Arms
Moderate
Within parent city
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 16 tracts In Mount Pleasant
Moderate
Within county
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#87 of 98 tracts In Charleston County
Very Low
Within state
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#1,269 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mount Pleasant and the region

Centroid at 32.7802, -79.8675 · click any tract to drill in

Why Waterway Arms scores 1.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mount Pleasant
2.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
4.4% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$2,006 rent vs county FMR
6.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mount Pleasant
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mount Pleasant
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mount Pleasant
2.0

How Waterway Arms compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Waterway Arms risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.61.6This tracttract 004701Mount Pleasant: 2.22.2Mount Pleasantparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 2

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 142Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 5.85%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.1%Peak (2014)
  • 22Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450190047012012: 42 filings (6.92/100 renter HHs)2013: 29 filings (4.78/100 renter HHs)2014: 49 filings (8.07/100 renter HHs)2015: 22 filings (3.62/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 48% over the past 4 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 217Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.74×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 6 filings (1.85× baseline)2020-02-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-05-01: 9 filings (1.80× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-08-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (0.94× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-03-01: 8 filings (2.29× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-06-01: 7 filings (3.50× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-05-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-06-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2023-09-01: 6 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-05-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-07-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-10-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-02-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-04-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.29× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (1.18× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Charleston, SC as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Waterway Arms

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Mount Pleasant eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Charleston County average of 5.2 and below the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.74x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 142 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 5.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 8.1% of renter households in 2014.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45019004701

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45019004701?

Census tract 45019004701 in the Waterway Arms neighborhood scores 1.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45019004701?

Median gross rent is $2,006/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45019004701?

4.4% of residents in tract 45019004701 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,617.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45019004701?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 5th, minority 18th, housing 6th.
Q5

Is tract 45019004701 considered part of Waterway Arms?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45019004701 fall within Waterway Arms (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45019004701?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 142 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 45019004701 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.85% of renter households, peaking at 8.1% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 45019004701 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.74× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Charleston eviction risk, SC), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 45019004701 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 45019004701 compare to Mount Pleasant overall?

Tract 45019004701 scores 1.6/10, lower than the parent city of Mount Pleasant at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mount Pleasant eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mount Pleasant

Top eight tracts in Mount Pleasant ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related