Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Cokesbury Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 45047970101 · Greenwood County, SC · pop 3,588 · 8% of tract blocks fall in Cokesbury
45047970101 is a census tract in Cokesbury, SC. It scores 3/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,588. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.8/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 9%
Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,420
Renter share19.5%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate12.0%
Median income$55,956
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
29
th percentile
Low
National
20
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cokesbury and the region
Centroid at 34.3089, -82.1849 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cokesbury scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cokesbury
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.9
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
12.0% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$960 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cokesbury
1.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cokesbury
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cokesbury
2.2
How Cokesbury compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 34%Socioeconomic
- 31%Household composition
- 39%Racial/ethnic minority
- 23%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 361Total filings over 5 yrs
- 33.12%Avg annual filing rate
- 43.8%Peak (2012)
- 43Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 40% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.3%Housing insecurity
- 9.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 18.4%Food insecurity
- 11.5%SNAP enrollment
- 8.6%Transit barriers
- 10.9%No health insurance
- 16.6%Frequent mental distress
- 34.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cokesbury
Severe burden reaches 30%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. 53% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Greenwood County average of 38.4%. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 9/10.
Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.1/10. It sits 1.1 points below the Greenwood County average of 4.1.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 361 filings here across 5 tracked years. The worst year on record was 2012, when 43.8% of renter households were served.
In a typical year about 33.1% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
At 20% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 3.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 45047970101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45047970101?
Census tract 45047970101 in Cokesbury scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 45047970101?
Median gross rent is $960/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 45047970101?
12.0% of residents in tract 45047970101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,588.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 45047970101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 34th, household 31th, minority 39th, housing 23th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45047970101?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 361 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45047970101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 33.12% of renter households, peaking at 43.8% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 45047970101 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 45047970101 compare to Cokesbury overall?
Tract 45047970101 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Cokesbury at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cokesbury; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related