Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #19,618 of 84,120 nationally

Tanglewood Eviction Risk: Moderate , Woodfield

Tract 45079011304 · Richland County, SC · pop 6,200 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi

Census tract 45079011304 covers part of the Tanglewood area of Woodfield, SC, and scores 5.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 6,200. 54% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 46% Stable renters 17% Owners 37%
Tract context
Occupied units2,950
Renter share63.1%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate23.9%
Median income$35,989

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Tanglewood
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Woodfield
Very High
Within county
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 98 tracts In Richland County
Very High
Within state
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#36 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Woodfield and the region

Centroid at 34.0638, -80.9420 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tanglewood scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Woodfield
7.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.9
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
23.9% poverty · this tract
6.0
Supply constraint
$1,150 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Woodfield
9.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Woodfield
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Woodfield
9.0

How Tanglewood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tanglewood risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.9This tracttract 0113044.5Woodfieldparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 80

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 3,640Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 58.81%Avg annual filing rate
  • 62.0%Peak (2010)
  • 643Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 45079011304
Filings dropped 22% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Tanglewood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tanglewood

Cost burden runs 73% here against 49.7% across Richland County. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.8/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 9.4/10.

Annualized rent equals 38% of average household income of $35,989, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 9/10.

Against the Richland County average of 4.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.7 points. The poverty rate is 24%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

Court records carry 3,640 eviction filings across 5 observed years. Housing insecurity runs 21.5% against 14.2% nationally.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 14.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. The worst year on record was 2010, when 62.0% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 58.8% of renter households face a filing.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 45079011304

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45079011304?

Census tract 45079011304 in the Tanglewood neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45079011304?

Median gross rent is $1,150/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 73% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45079011304?

23.9% of residents in tract 45079011304 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,200.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45079011304?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 69th, minority 91th, housing 48th.
Q5

Is tract 45079011304 considered part of Tanglewood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45079011304 fall within Tanglewood (neighborhood centroid within 0.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45079011304?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3,640 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45079011304 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 58.81% of renter households, peaking at 62.0% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45079011304 struggle to pay rent?

About 21.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45079011304 compare to Woodfield overall?

Tract 45079011304 scores 5.9/10, higher than the parent city of Woodfield at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Woodfield; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Woodfield

Top eight tracts in Woodfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related