Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Adams Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 47147080200 · Robertson County, TN · pop 5,767 · 11% of tract blocks fall in Adams

47147080200 is a census tract in Adams, TN. It scores 3/10 for landlords. The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1.2/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 12% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units2,153
Renter share16.0%
SVI overall0.48
Poverty rate8.4%
Median income$88,961

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Adams
Moderate
Within county
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 15 tracts In Robertson County
Very Low
Within state
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#1,176 of 1,701 tracts In Tennessee
Low
National
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Adams and the region

Centroid at 36.5747, -86.9557 · click any tract to drill in

Why Adams scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Adams
3.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.7
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
8.4% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$1,125 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Adams
2.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Adams
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Adams
3.1

How Adams compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Adams risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0802003.2Adamsparent city3.7Countyavg tract in county3.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 48

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Adams

23% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Robertson County average of 34.5%. 19% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.9/10.

Running cool, economic stress reads 2.1/10. It sits 0.7 points below the Robertson County average of 3.7. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 16% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.3/10.

Against average income of $88,961, annual rent is just 15%. Statewide the TN average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler.

Average gross rent is $1,125, close to the Adams average.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 47147080200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47147080200?

Census tract 47147080200 in Adams scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 47147080200?

Median gross rent is $1,125/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 47147080200?

8.4% of residents in tract 47147080200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,767.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 47147080200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 48th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 58th, household 45th, minority 19th, housing 45th.
Q5

How does tract 47147080200 compare to Adams overall?

Tract 47147080200 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Adams at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Adams; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related