Census Tract · Ranked #49,882 of 84,120 nationally
Blanket Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 48049950300 ·
Brown, TX · pop 3,154 · 16% of tract blocks fall in Blanket
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 48049950300 (Blanket, Texas) comes in at 3.5/10, the Lower tier. That is riskier than roughly 5% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 29% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $833 a month while the average household earns $64,375 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 11% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 8%Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,197
Renter share10.9%
SVI overall0.63
Poverty rate8.8%
Median income$64,375
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Blanket
Moderate
Within county
8th percentile
#12 of 13 tracts In Brown
Very Low
Within state
42th percentile
#4,027 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Moderate
National
41th percentile
#49,882 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Blanket and the region
Centroid at 31.7414, -98.8473 · click any tract to drill in
Why Blanket scores 3.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Blanket
2.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
1.4
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
8.8% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$833 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Blanket
3.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Blanket
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Blanket
4.6
How Blanket compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 63
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
What moves this score most is housing court bias at 4.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Blanket, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Brown County average of 4.5 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 63rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 48049950300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48049950300?
Census tract 48049950300 in Blanket scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48049950300?
Median gross rent is $833/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 29% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48049950300?
8.8% of residents in tract 48049950300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,154.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48049950300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 63th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 83th, minority 22th, housing 53th.
Q5
How does tract 48049950300 compare to Blanket overall?
Tract 48049950300 scores 3.5/10, higher than the parent city of Blanket at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Blanket; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.