Census Tract · Ranked #54,934 of 84,120 nationally
Log Cabin Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 48213951102 ·
Henderson County, TX · pop 3,057 · 31% of tract blocks fall in Log Cabin
In Log Cabin in Henderson County, census tract 48213951102 scores 4.6/10 for eviction risk. It lands near the 25th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 44% of renter households, a severe level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $888 a month while the average household earns $66,154 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 17% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%Stable renters 10%Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units1,114
Renter share17.1%
SVI overall0.44
Poverty rate11.1%
Median income$66,154
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Log Cabin
Moderate
Within county
19th percentile
#23 of 28 tracts In Henderson County
Very Low
Within state
35th percentile
#4,444 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
National
35th percentile
#54,934 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Log Cabin and the region
Centroid at 32.2388, -96.0059 · click any tract to drill in
Why Log Cabin scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Log Cabin
2.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
11.1% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$888 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Log Cabin
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Log Cabin
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Log Cabin
5.3
How Log Cabin compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 44
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
The heaviest input here is housing court bias at 5.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Log Cabin, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Henderson County average of 4.8 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 44th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 48213951102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48213951102?
Census tract 48213951102 in Log Cabin scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48213951102?
Median gross rent is $888/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48213951102?
11.1% of residents in tract 48213951102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,057.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48213951102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 44th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 60th, household 49th, minority 14th, housing 33th.
Q5
How does tract 48213951102 compare to Log Cabin overall?
Tract 48213951102 scores 3.2/10, higher than the parent city of Log Cabin at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Log Cabin; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.