Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Log Cabin Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 48213951102 · Henderson County, TX · pop 3,057 · 31% of tract blocks fall in Log Cabin
With a score of 3/10, tract 48213951102 in Log Cabin, TX reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,057. Pulling hardest the other way is state political climate at 1.5/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%
Stable renters 10%
Owners 83%
Tract context
Occupied units1,114
Renter share17.1%
SVI overall0.44
Poverty rate11.1%
Median income$66,154
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
19
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
35
th percentile
Low
National
20
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Log Cabin and the region
Centroid at 32.2388, -96.0059 · click any tract to drill in
Why Log Cabin scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Log Cabin
2.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
11.1% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$888 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Log Cabin
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Log Cabin
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Log Cabin
5.3
How Log Cabin compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 44
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 60%Socioeconomic
- 49%Household composition
- 14%Racial/ethnic minority
- 33%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Log Cabin
Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.8/10. 19% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the softer side, regional political climate reads 2/10.
At $888 a month, rents run 17% under what the rest of Log Cabin commands. It sits 0.7 points below the Henderson County average of 3.7. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Only 17% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5/10.
Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $66,154, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the TX average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler. 44% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 48213951102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48213951102?
Census tract 48213951102 in Log Cabin scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48213951102?
Median gross rent is $888/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48213951102?
11.1% of residents in tract 48213951102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,057.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48213951102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 44th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 60th, household 49th, minority 14th, housing 33th.
Q5
How does tract 48213951102 compare to Log Cabin overall?
Tract 48213951102 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Log Cabin at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Log Cabin; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related