Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #82,639 of 84,120 nationally
Sonoma Verde Eviction Risk: Lower , McLendon-Chisholm
Tract 48397040509 · Rockwall, TX · pop 2,948 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
Tract 48397040509, home to 2,948 residents in the Sonoma Verde neighborhood of McLendon-Chisholm, scores 2.8/10 for landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #83,152 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
0% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $200,313 a year. Renters make up 1% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.1
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%
Stable renters 1%
Owners 99%
Tract context
Occupied units868
Renter share0.8%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate0.6%
Median income$200,313
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
36
th percentile
Low
Within state
3
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across McLendon-Chisholm and the region
Centroid at 32.8373, -96.3547 · click any tract to drill in
Why Sonoma Verde scores 1.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from McLendon-Chisholm
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
0.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from McLendon-Chisholm
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from McLendon-Chisholm
1.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from McLendon-Chisholm
1.8
How Sonoma Verde compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 4
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 14%Socioeconomic
- 7%Household composition
- 55%Racial/ethnic minority
- 4%Housing & transportation
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Sonoma Verde
The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from McLendon-Chisholm, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Rockwall County average of 4.4 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 4th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 48397040509
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48397040509?
Census tract 48397040509 in the Sonoma Verde neighborhood scores 1.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 48397040509?
0.6% of residents in tract 48397040509 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,948.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 48397040509?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 14th, household 7th, minority 55th, housing 4th.
Q4
Is tract 48397040509 considered part of Sonoma Verde?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48397040509 fall within Sonoma Verde (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q5
How does tract 48397040509 compare to McLendon-Chisholm overall?
Tract 48397040509 scores 1.1/10, lower than the parent city of McLendon-Chisholm at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from McLendon-Chisholm; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related