Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Census Tract · Ranked #42,763 of 84,120 nationally
Logan Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49005000302 · Cache, UT · pop 6,263 · 55% of tract blocks fall in Logan
How risky is Logan in Cache County for landlords? Census tract 49005000302 scores 3.7/10, the Lower tier. That is riskier than roughly 7% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 35% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $962 a month against an average household income of $77,663 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 28% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 18%
Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,895
Renter share28.3%
SVI overall0.55
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$77,663
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
63
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
86
th percentile
High
National
49
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Logan and the region
Centroid at 41.7329, -111.8990 · click any tract to drill in
Why Logan scores 3.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Logan
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$962 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Logan
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Logan
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Logan
7.2
How Logan compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 55
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 57%Socioeconomic
- 53%Household composition
- 42%Racial/ethnic minority
- 50%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.9%Housing insecurity
- 9.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 17.3%Food insecurity
- 10.3%SNAP enrollment
- 9.6%Transit barriers
- 14.4%No health insurance
- 18.2%Frequent mental distress
- 30.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Logan
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Logan eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Cache County average of 3.6 and in line with the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 55th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 12.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 49005000302
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49005000302?
Census tract 49005000302 in Logan scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49005000302?
Median gross rent is $962/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49005000302?
7.1% of residents in tract 49005000302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,263.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49005000302?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 55th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 57th, household 53th, minority 42th, housing 50th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 49005000302 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 49005000302 compare to Logan overall?
Tract 49005000302 scores 3.9/10, higher than the parent city of Logan at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Logan eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Logan
Top eight tracts in Logan ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · UT
Hillcrest Neighborhood
6.3
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · UT
The Island
6.2
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · UT
Harvest Cove
6.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · UT
The Island
6.1
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · UT
Harvest Cove
6
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · UT
49005001002
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · UT
The Island
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · UT
Harvest Cove
5.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Related