Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally
Vineyard Eviction Risk: Lower , Logan
Tract 49005001101 · Cache, UT · pop 6,104 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
The Lower-tier score of 2.8/10 for census tract 49005001101 reflects conditions in the Vineyard area of Logan, Utah. On the national scale it ranks #83,156 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 20% of renter households, a modest level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,385 a month against an average household income of $79,886 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 34% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%
Stable renters 27%
Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units2,087
Renter share33.7%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate10.3%
Median income$79,886
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
48
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
63
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Logan and the region
Centroid at 41.7091, -111.8180 · click any tract to drill in
Why Vineyard scores 2.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Logan
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
10.3% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,385 rent vs county FMR
6.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Logan
2.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Logan
3.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Logan
3.9
How Vineyard compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 15
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 8%Socioeconomic
- 25%Household composition
- 32%Racial/ethnic minority
- 35%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 40Total filings over 11 yrs
- 0.85%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.1%Peak (2011)
- 1Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Vineyard. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.1%Housing insecurity
- 6.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.2%Food insecurity
- 5.7%SNAP enrollment
- 6.4%Transit barriers
- 8.6%No health insurance
- 16.1%Frequent mental distress
- 27.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Vineyard
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 6.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Logan eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Cache County average of 3.6 and below the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 15th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 40 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 0.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.1% of renter households in 2011.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 49005001101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49005001101?
Census tract 49005001101 in the Vineyard neighborhood scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49005001101?
Median gross rent is $1,385/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 20% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49005001101?
10.3% of residents in tract 49005001101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,104.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49005001101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 25th, minority 32th, housing 35th.
Q5
Is tract 49005001101 considered part of Vineyard?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49005001101 fall within Vineyard (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49005001101?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 40 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 49005001101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.85% of renter households, peaking at 2.1% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 49005001101 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 49005001101 compare to Logan overall?
Tract 49005001101 scores 2.7/10, higher than the parent city of Logan at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Logan eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related