Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #57,812 of 84,120 nationally

Sunny Ridge Eviction Risk: Lower , Round Hill

Tract 51107610202 · Loudoun County, VA · pop 5,602 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

With a score of 3.5/10, tract 51107610202 in the Sunny Ridge area of Round Hill, VA reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,602. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.

Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 6% Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,752
Renter share9.4%
SVI overall0.00
Poverty rate0.9%
Median income$209,375

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Sunny Ridge
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Round Hill
Moderate
Within county
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#68 of 75 tracts In Loudoun County
Very Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#1,425 of 2,186 tracts In Virginia
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Round Hill and the region

Centroid at 39.1538, -77.8011 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sunny Ridge scores 3.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Round Hill
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
Virginia legislature & governorship
3.2
Economic stress
0.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,778 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Round Hill
3.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Round Hill
6.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Round Hill
3.1

How Sunny Ridge compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sunny Ridge risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.53.5This tracttract 610202Round Hill: 3.83.8Round Hillparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.24.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 0

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 4Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 2.53%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.5%Peak (2016)
  • 4Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sunny Ridge

At $1,778 a month, rents run 28% over what the rest of Round Hill commands. SNAP participation runs 4.0% against 15.2% nationally.

Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.6/10. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 7.3/10. The filing record is not thin: 4 evictions over 1 years of observation.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Filings peaked in 2016 at 2.5% of renter households. In a typical year about 2.5% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #57,812 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 9% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Rent consumes only 10% of average household income of $209,375, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 1%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. 40% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 51107610202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 51107610202?

Census tract 51107610202 in the Sunny Ridge neighborhood scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 51107610202?

Median gross rent is $1,778/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 51107610202?

0.9% of residents in tract 51107610202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,602.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 51107610202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 0th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 5th, minority 32th, housing 1th.
Q5

Is tract 51107610202 considered part of Sunny Ridge?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 51107610202 fall within Sunny Ridge (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 51107610202?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 4 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 51107610202 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.53% of renter households, peaking at 2.5% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 51107610202 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 51107610202 compare to Round Hill overall?

Tract 51107610202 scores 3.5/10, lower than the parent city of Round Hill at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Round Hill; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related