Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #22,681 of 84,120 nationally

Sequim Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 53009002002 · Clallam County, WA · pop 3,947 · 63% of tract blocks fall in Sequim

53009002002 is a census tract in Sequim, WA. It scores 5.6/10 for landlords. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.1/10.

Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 14% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,676
Renter share21.3%
SVI overall0.66
Poverty rate4.5%
Median income$71,636

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 5 tracts In Sequim
Moderate
Within county
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 24 tracts In Clallam County
Moderate
Within state
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#986 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Moderate
National
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#22,681 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sequim and the region

Centroid at 48.0618, -123.0887 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sequim scores 5.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sequim
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.2
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
4.5% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,074 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sequim
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sequim
8.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sequim
7.4

How Sequim compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sequim risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.6This tracttract 0020026.3Sequimparent city5.7Countyavg tract in county5.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 66

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sequim

Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.1/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.1/10.

At $1,074 a month, rents run 10% under what the rest of Sequim commands. That is riskier than roughly 73% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 21% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

Social vulnerability reads 6.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Against average income of $71,636, annual rent is just 18%. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Rent takes 30% or more of income for around a third of renters.

It tracks the Clallam County average of 5.7 closely.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 53009002002

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53009002002?

Census tract 53009002002 in Sequim scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53009002002?

Median gross rent is $1,074/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53009002002?

4.5% of residents in tract 53009002002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,947.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53009002002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 66th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 40th, household 86th, minority 16th, housing 86th.
Q5

How does tract 53009002002 compare to Sequim overall?

Tract 53009002002 scores 5.6/10, lower than the parent city of Sequim at 6.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sequim; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sequim

Top eight tracts in Sequim ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related