Tract 53027000501 ·
Grays Harbor County, WA · pop 3,606 · 20% of tract blocks fall in Satsop
Census tract 53027000501 runs through Satsop. With 3,606 residents, it scores 4.8/10 for landlords. It lands near the 30th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 32% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $931 a month while the average household earns $47,896 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 20% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
6.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%Stable renters 14%Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,151
Renter share20.1%
SVI overall0.75
Poverty rate26.8%
Median income$47,896
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Satsop
Moderate
Within county
79th percentile
#5 of 20 tracts In Grays Harbor County
High
Within state
90th percentile
#173 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very High
National
92th percentile
#6,848 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Satsop and the region
Centroid at 47.0463, -123.4243 · click any tract to drill in
Why Satsop scores 6.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Satsop
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.7
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
26.8% poverty · this tract
6.7
Supply constraint
$931 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Satsop
1.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Satsop
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Satsop
3.9
How Satsop compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 75
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
The score leans hardest on economic stress at 6.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Satsop, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Grays Harbor County average of 5.1 and below the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 75th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 53027000501
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53027000501?
Census tract 53027000501 in Satsop scores 6.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 53027000501?
Median gross rent is $931/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 53027000501?
26.8% of residents in tract 53027000501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,606.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 53027000501?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 75th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 79th, household 74th, minority 36th, housing 66th.
Q5
How does tract 53027000501 compare to Satsop overall?
Tract 53027000501 scores 6.6/10, right in line with the parent city of Satsop at 6.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Satsop; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.