Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally

Forest Glen South Eviction Risk: Lower , Kent

Tract 53033029307 · King County, WA · pop 3,892 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 53033029307 runs through the Forest Glen South area of Kent. With 3,892 residents, it scores 5.5/10 for landlords. On the national scale it ranks #37,744 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

51% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 5% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,699 a month against an average household income of $112,857 a year, roughly 29% of income at the averages. About 13% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 6% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,340
Renter share12.8%
SVI overall0.33
Poverty rate2.3%
Median income$112,857

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Forest Glen South
Moderate
Within parent city
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#24 of 30 tracts In Kent
Low
Within county
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#303 of 494 tracts In King County
Low
Within state
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#1,169 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kent and the region

Centroid at 47.4218, -122.1595 · click any tract to drill in

Why Forest Glen South scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kent
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
2.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,699 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kent
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kent
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kent
6.4

How Forest Glen South compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Forest Glen South risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 029307Kent: 7.27.2Kentparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 33

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 24Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 1.58%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.2%Peak (2008)
  • 1Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530330293072004: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2005: 1 filings (0.55/100 renter HHs)2006: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2007: 3 filings (1.66/100 renter HHs)2008: 4 filings (2.21/100 renter HHs)2009: 4 filings (2.21/100 renter HHs)2010: 3 filings (1.75/100 renter HHs)2011: 4 filings (1.90/100 renter HHs)2012: 4 filings (1.90/100 renter HHs)2013: 1 filings (0.47/100 renter HHs)
Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Forest Glen South

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Kent eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the King County average of 5.5 and in line with the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 33rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 24 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 1.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.2% of renter households in 2008.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53033029307

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53033029307?

Census tract 53033029307 in the Forest Glen South neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53033029307?

Median gross rent is $2,699/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53033029307?

2.3% of residents in tract 53033029307 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,892.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53033029307?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 33th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 11th, household 48th, minority 61th, housing 55th.
Q5

Is tract 53033029307 considered part of Forest Glen South?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53033029307 fall within Forest Glen South (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53033029307?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 24 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 53033029307 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.58% of renter households, peaking at 2.2% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 53033029307 compare to Kent overall?

Tract 53033029307 scores 3.8/10, lower than the parent city of Kent at 7.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kent eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Kent

Top eight tracts in Kent ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related