Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #82,639 of 84,120 nationally

Rosedale Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 53053072504 · Pierce County, WA · pop 4,747 · 43% of tract blocks fall in Rosedale

Rosedale in Pierce County is where census tract 53053072504 sits, home to 4,747 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 4.9/10. On the national scale it ranks #56,048 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 33% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 5% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,179 a month while the average household earns $149,622 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 14% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 9% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,479
Renter share13.7%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$149,622

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Rosedale
Moderate
Within county
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#193 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Very Low
Within state
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#1,752 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#82,639 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rosedale and the region

Centroid at 47.3413, -122.6325 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rosedale scores 1.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rosedale
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,179 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rosedale
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rosedale
2.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rosedale
4.6

How Rosedale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rosedale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.11.1This tracttract 072504Rosedale: 6.76.7Rosedaleparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 22

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 42Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 1.51%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.9%Peak (2014)
  • 5Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530530725042004: 2 filings (1.04/100 renter HHs)2005: 4 filings (1.69/100 renter HHs)2006: 4 filings (1.69/100 renter HHs)2007: 2 filings (0.84/100 renter HHs)2008: 3 filings (1.27/100 renter HHs)2009: 3 filings (1.27/100 renter HHs)2010: 4 filings (1.50/100 renter HHs)2012: 2 filings (0.73/100 renter HHs)2013: 5 filings (1.82/100 renter HHs)2014: 8 filings (2.91/100 renter HHs)2015: 5 filings (1.82/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 150% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 10Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.58×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rosedale

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rosedale, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Pierce County average of 5.5 and in line with the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 22nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.58x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053072504

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053072504?

Census tract 53053072504 in Rosedale scores 1.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053072504?

Median gross rent is $2,179/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053072504?

2.5% of residents in tract 53053072504 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,747.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053072504?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 8th, minority 33th, housing 59th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053072504?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 42 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053072504 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.51% of renter households, peaking at 2.9% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 53053072504 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.58× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 53053072504 compare to Rosedale overall?

Tract 53053072504 scores 1.1/10, lower than the parent city of Rosedale at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rosedale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related