Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #23,554 of 84,120 nationally

Lake Stickney Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 53061041810 · Snohomish County, WA · pop 5,496 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 53061041810 (Lake Stickney in Lake Stickney, Washington) comes in at 5.6/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 59% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 63% of renter households, a severe level, and 30% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,010 monthly, set against $59,052 in average yearly household income, roughly 41% of income at the averages. About 77% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 48% Stable renters 29% Owners 23%
Tract context
Occupied units2,621
Renter share77.0%
SVI overall0.69
Poverty rate24.6%
Median income$59,052

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Lake Stickney
Low
Within county
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#23 of 173 tracts In Snohomish County
High
Within state
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#621 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Elevated
National
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#23,554 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lake Stickney and the region

Centroid at 47.8861, -122.2491 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lake Stickney scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lake Stickney
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
24.6% poverty · this tract
6.1
Supply constraint
$2,010 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lake Stickney
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lake Stickney
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lake Stickney
5.0

How Lake Stickney compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lake Stickney risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 041810Lake Stickney: 6.86.8Lake Stickneyparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 69

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 252Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 3.13%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.1%Peak (2008)
  • 55Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2008 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530610418102008: 67 filings (4.12/100 renter HHs)2014: 40 filings (2.70/100 renter HHs)2015: 47 filings (3.17/100 renter HHs)2016: 43 filings (2.48/100 renter HHs)2017: 55 filings (3.17/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 18% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lake Stickney. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lake Stickney

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 6.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lake Stickney, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Snohomish County average of 5.2 and above the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 69th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 252 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 3.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.1% of renter households in 2008.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53061041810

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53061041810?

Census tract 53061041810 in the Lake Stickney neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53061041810?

Median gross rent is $2,010/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53061041810?

24.6% of residents in tract 53061041810 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,496.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53061041810?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 69th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 82th, household 36th, minority 66th, housing 53th.
Q5

Is tract 53061041810 considered part of Lake Stickney?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53061041810 fall within Lake Stickney (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53061041810?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 252 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 53061041810 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.13% of renter households, peaking at 4.1% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 53061041810 compare to Lake Stickney overall?

Tract 53061041810 scores 5.1/10, lower than the parent city of Lake Stickney at 6.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lake Stickney; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related