Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally
Cedar Valley Eviction Risk: Moderate , Lynnwood
Tract 53061051929 · Snohomish County, WA · pop 4,457 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Census tract 53061051929 covers part of the Cedar Valley area of Alderwood Manor, WA, and scores 5.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,457 residents. The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1.7/10.
Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22%
Stable renters 20%
Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units1,635
Renter share42.2%
SVI overall0.60
Poverty rate10.4%
Median income$118,558
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
52
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
40
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lynnwood and the region
Centroid at 47.8125, -122.2816 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cedar Valley scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Lynnwood
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
10.4% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,800 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lynnwood
6.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lynnwood
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lynnwood
4.8
How Cedar Valley compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 60
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 50%Socioeconomic
- 32%Household composition
- 60%Racial/ethnic minority
- 82%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Cedar Valley. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cedar Valley
22% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, economic stress reads 2.6/10.
Against Snohomish County at 47.3%, 53% of renters here are cost-burdened. On the softer side, court filing pressure reads 2.9/10. That is riskier than roughly 70% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Social vulnerability reads 6.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Snohomish County average of 5.4 closely.
Average gross rent is $1,800, close to the Alderwood Manor average. Annual rent works out to 18% of average household income of $118,558. 42% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 53061051929
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53061051929?
Census tract 53061051929 in the Cedar Valley neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 53061051929?
Median gross rent is $1,800/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 53061051929?
10.4% of residents in tract 53061051929 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,457.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 53061051929?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 60th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 50th, household 32th, minority 60th, housing 82th.
Q5
Is tract 53061051929 considered part of Cedar Valley?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53061051929 fall within Cedar Valley (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How does tract 53061051929 compare to Lynnwood overall?
Tract 53061051929 scores 5.4/10, lower than the parent city of Lynnwood at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lynnwood eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Lynnwood
Top eight tracts in Lynnwood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related