Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #37,643 of 84,120 nationally
Lake Roesiger Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 53061053606 · Snohomish County, WA · pop 3,409 · 11% of tract blocks fall in Lake Roesiger
The Moderate-tier score of 4.5/10 for census tract 53061053606 reflects conditions in Lake Roesiger, Washington. That is riskier than roughly 22% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
35% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,473 monthly, set against $115,812 in average yearly household income, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 9% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%
Stable renters 6%
Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units1,363
Renter share9.3%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate11.3%
Median income$115,812
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
74
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
45
th percentile
Moderate
National
55
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lake Roesiger and the region
Centroid at 48.0123, -121.6783 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lake Roesiger scores 4.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Lake Roesiger
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
11.3% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,473 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lake Roesiger
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lake Roesiger
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lake Roesiger
4.3
How Lake Roesiger compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 7
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 18%Socioeconomic
- 31%Household composition
- 16%Racial/ethnic minority
- 5%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lake Roesiger
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 5.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lake Roesiger, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Snohomish County average of 5.2 and below the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 7th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 53061053606
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53061053606?
Census tract 53061053606 in Lake Roesiger scores 4.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 53061053606?
Median gross rent is $1,473/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 53061053606?
11.3% of residents in tract 53061053606 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,409.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 53061053606?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 18th, household 31th, minority 16th, housing 5th.
Q5
How does tract 53061053606 compare to Lake Roesiger overall?
Tract 53061053606 scores 4.2/10, lower than the parent city of Lake Roesiger at 6.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lake Roesiger; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related