Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #37,643 of 84,120 nationally

Fairmont Eviction Risk: Moderate , Everett

Tract 53061041809 · Snohomish County, WA · pop 4,947 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

The Moderate-tier score of 4.9/10 for census tract 53061041809 reflects conditions in the Fairmont area of Everett, Washington. That is riskier than about 33% of US census tracts.

37% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,662 monthly, set against $69,176 in average yearly household income, roughly 29% of income at the averages. Renters make up 60% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.2
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 37% Owners 41%
Tract context
Occupied units2,270
Renter share59.9%
SVI overall0.78
Poverty rate15.6%
Median income$69,176

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Fairmont
Low
Within county
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#47 of 173 tracts In Snohomish County
Elevated
Within state
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#981 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Moderate
National
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#37,643 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Everett and the region

Centroid at 47.8918, -122.2455 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fairmont scores 4.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Everett
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
15.6% poverty · this tract
3.9
Supply constraint
$1,662 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Everett
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Everett
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Everett
5.0

How Fairmont compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fairmont risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.24.2This tracttract 041809Everett: 6.96.9Everettparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 78

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 321Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 5.00%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.0%Peak (2017)
  • 79Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2008 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530610418092008: 50 filings (3.95/100 renter HHs)2014: 66 filings (5.23/100 renter HHs)2015: 62 filings (4.91/100 renter HHs)2016: 64 filings (4.89/100 renter HHs)2017: 79 filings (6.04/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 58% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Fairmont. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fairmont

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Everett eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Snohomish County average of 5.2 and in line with the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 78th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 321 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 5.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 6.0% of renter households in 2017.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53061041809

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53061041809?

Census tract 53061041809 in the Fairmont neighborhood scores 4.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53061041809?

Median gross rent is $1,662/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53061041809?

15.6% of residents in tract 53061041809 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,947.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53061041809?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 78th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 35th, minority 61th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 53061041809 considered part of Fairmont?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53061041809 fall within Fairmont (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53061041809?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 321 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 53061041809 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.00% of renter households, peaking at 6.0% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 53061041809 compare to Everett overall?

Tract 53061041809 scores 4.2/10, lower than the parent city of Everett at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Everett eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related